佰家富app官网网址-佰家富app网址

来源：佰家富app开户2024-08-16 17:48

最新！河北1市中小学寒假时间定了******url:https://m.gmw.cn/2023-01/06/content_1303245664.htm,id:1303245664

　　定州市教育局最新发布通知，确定中小学（园）寒假放假时间↓↓↓

　　为切实做好2023年全市中小学、幼儿园寒假前后工作，日前，定州市教育局发布通知，对寒假及春季开学做出相应安排。

　　放假安排：义务教育阶段学校、幼儿园和职业学校非毕业班年级1月13日（腊月廿二）放假；普通高中学校和职业学校毕业班年级1月17日（腊月廿六）放假。

　　开学安排：义务教育阶段学校、幼儿园和职业学校非毕业班年级2月6日（正月十六）开学；普通高中学校和职业学校毕业班年级1月29日（正月初八）开学。

　　同时，定州市教育局对学生放假前后相关工作提出具体要求。

　　深入开展校园爱国卫生运动。各学校放假后和开学前，要做好校园内的环境消杀工作，确保爱国卫生运动工作落到实处。要加大校园环境卫生整治力度，全方位改善学校环境卫生，彻底消除卫生死角和蚊虫寄生地。要以班级为单位通过线上课堂、致家长的一封信等形式，教育学生及家长注意个人防护，养成良好的卫生习惯，做到勤洗手、勤通风、戴口罩、少聚集，做好自己健康的第一责任人。

　　严格规范办学行为。各学校要维护师生合法权益，不得随意增减假期时长，不得加重学生假期课业负担，确保学生有自主安排活动的时间。各学校要严格落实好中央“双减”和教育部“五项管理”政策规定，引导学生在寒假期间健康上网、加强体育锻炼、培养良好的阅读习惯、养成良好的睡眠习惯，促进学生健康成长。要按照年级统一，总量控制，个别调整的原则，布置系统性、多样性书面作业、实践性作业和探究性作业，积极探索布置跨学科综合性作业，严禁给家长布置作业或让家长代为评改作业，严禁让家长从QQ群或微信群下载打印学生作业。

　　科学指导假期生活。各学校要加强宣传贯彻《中华人民共和国家庭教育促进法》，引导家长树立科学教育理念，以促进学生健康快乐成长为出发点和落脚点，和学生共同商量制定科学合理的寒假计划，培养学生自我管理、自我发展的能力，避免盲目送孩子参加辅导培训，减轻学生培训负担。要组织教师开展线上家访和 “一对一”学生谈话，全面了解掌握学生成长环境和思想动态，增进家校之间的沟通和信任，引导学生加强体育锻炼、开展文艺活动、强化劳动实践、做好近视防控等，丰富学生假期生活，不能荒废学业。要开通“心理咨询热线”，加强学生的居家心理健康教育，做好心理健康辅导。

　　全面做好开学准备工作。各单位要提前安排好新学期工作，结合本学期线上教学局限性，做好下学期工作计划，明确工作目标，理清工作思路，谋划工作重点。要组织教职工按时到校上班，提前备课，做好教材到位等准备工作。要对校舍、电力线路、生活设施、食堂餐厅和体育活动设施等进行全面安全检查，消除安全隐患。按照疫情防控有关要求，坚持科学防控、精准施策，确保开学后师生的人身安全和教学工作的正常开展。

　　转自|定州教育

佰家富app官网网址

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.